Friday, January 11, 2013

January 11 Online Discussion Question 5

Find a very poor (and possibly ugly) example of a web site and post it here with a short explanation of what went wrong!

8 comments:

  1. http://www.mynewdog.org/

    Awful photoshopped pics of dogs, ugly color scheme, and overall tacky. None of the links either

    http://www.lingscars.com/
    Waaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyy too much going on! Too many bright colors and flashy graphics, and obnoxious music that the user has no control over. At least the web site functions!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ummm... This web site is all around obnoxious. If you stare at it for more than 10 seconds it will hurt your eyes. Way to many(moving) colors. Annoying cat on the bottom. But it does have a good message.
    Here is the link to the web site:www.dokimos.org/ajff/

    Ethan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You found a prime example of what web sites looked liked in the late 90's and early 00's. (when I was in high school, lol)

      Delete
  3. I couldn't really find any on the scale of Ethan's. That was crazy. xD.

    [Collin]

    ReplyDelete
  4. no content just many flashing colors
    http://www.worldsmostannoying.blogspot.com/

    {travis}

    ReplyDelete
  5. and this one too
    http://eshrooms.teamdead.net/
    !WARNING WILL HURT YOUR EYES!
    {TRAVIS}

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://coloradoranger.com/ There were these annoying blinking lights and as you scrolled down the fonts kept changing
    Gracie

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://ebenezer.triton.net/index.htm it's my old church's website, while it's been updated since the last time I saw it It hasn't improved much all it used to have was a crummy picture of the outside of the church, a photo of our pastor, and the scheduled times for the services, I think that within our first two weeks of class we could've made a better site. it's a bit better now, but still super simple... some people put too much in their websites which is what most of us seemed to post, but there are also those sites that don't have enough.

    ReplyDelete